ELECTION LAWS: Affidavit That Changed The World
Whistleblower Tore Says Discloses Black Box Elections From Her History as a Contractor for the US in Ukraine and Beyond.
Much has been said about this election affidavit, but the final words are far from spoken. And those words belong to WE THE PEOPLE, the inheritors of the United States Constitution. Standing strong on the road to victory at America 250 on July 4, 2026.
At date of publishing, this election affidavit changed the world. It has inspired citizens across the United States and world to understand. Reading is has inspired a vision for how the election rigging schemes funded by tax dollars and black budgets to control who is and is NOT elected. Or shall we say selected.
It’s important that every citizen of the United States and world read the entire document and understand the implications. To read it is to own the information. You must own what is most important. Elections, your speech.
In the coming months and years it will become more clear exactly what happened with the 2020 election in the United States. At a time of confusion, the election affidavit of Terpsehore P Maras illuminated clarity to those in search of an escape from the darkness of deception. This provided a foothold for people to rely on in their investigation.
The name of her radio program turned live stream and podcast is the Tore Says Show. It began in 2019 when she went public. Inspiring a movement in all 50 of the United States and strong contingencies in countries all across the world. She intentionally diminishes the appearance of her following so that the evil of the world will ignore her while she accomplishes the work of sparking action in citizens to own themselves and stand in freedom. She comes from Greek lineage which is the perfect origin for a 5th generation warrior of our time.
This affidavit was used in a recent Texas court case about election integrity and achieved a pivotal victory. More states are repeating what was achieved. As news spreads more people will want to understand how we got here and this work is in pursuit of public record and understanding. As more citizens investigate for themselves how elections are conducted, and take ownership of their local government once again.
The Help America Vote Act (HAVA) of 2002 has become a pinnacle in the battle ground conflict of freedom vs control. Along with the spy war happening behind the scenes and in plain sight. Below are essential excerpts from this soon to be infamous election affidavit. We will focus on the aspects related to the HAVA of 2002 (previously reported on), the Election Assistance Commission (EAC) and the problems of black box elections that deprive the citizens of oversight and transparency.
This is brief look at the election affidavit of Tore Says completed November 29th, 2020.
2. I have been a private contractor with experience gathering and analyzing foreign intelligence and acted as a LOCALIZER during the deployment of projects and operations both OCONUS and CONUS. I am a trained Cryptolinguist, hold a completed degree in Molecular and Cellular Physiology and have FORMAL training in other sciences such as Computational Linguistics, Game Theory, Algorithmic Aspects of Machine Learning, Predictive Analytics among others.
3. I have operational experience in sources and methods of implementing operations during elections both CONUS and OCONUS.
5. In my position from 1999-2014 I was responsible for delegating implementation via other contractors sub-contracting with US or 9 EYES agencies identifying connectivity, networking and subcontractors that would manage the micro operations.
6. My information is my personal knowledge and ability to detect relationships between the companies and validate that with the cryptographic knowledge I know and attest to as well as evidence of these relationships.
7. In addition, I am WELL versed due to my assignments during my time as a private contractor of how elections OCONUS (for countries I have had an assignment at) and CONUS (well versed in HAVA ACT) and more.
Taking a pause on the affidavit, let’s look into the HAVA act for ourselves for the key parts addressed in this affidavit.
HAVA Act of 2002
The Help America Vote Act of 2022 is clear on page one that it establishes the Election Assistance Commission.
to establish the Election Assistance Commission to assist in the administration of Federal elections
The EAC (Election Assistance Commission) established the requirements in their Voting System Test Laboratory Program Manual (Version 2.0 Effective May 31, 2015):
3.6.1. Certificate of Accreditation. A Certificate of Accreditation shall be issued to each laboratory accredited by vote of the Commissioners.
3.6.1.3. The effective date of the certification, which shall not exceed a period of two (2) years;
In the time since this affidavit Tore Says has conveyed to her listeners that she doesn’t believe this was an accident. That is was intentionally done to remove President Trump from office if he was declared the winner of the 2020 election. We understand and can see that Tore’s background on the HAVA Act inspired her actions in 2017 being knowledgeable of the accreditation issue.
8. On or about October 2017 I had reached out to the US Senate Majority Leader with an affidavit claiming that our elections in 2017 may be null and void due to lack of EAC certifications. In fact Sen. Wyden sent a letter to Jack Cobb on 31 OCT 2017 advising discreetly pointing out the importance of being CERTIFIED EAC had issued a certificate to Pro V & V and that expired on Feb 24, 2017. No other certification has been located.
9. Section 231(b) of the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) of 2002 (42 U.S.C. §15371(b)) requires that the EAC provide for the accreditation and revocation of accreditation of independent, non-federal laboratories qualified to test voting systems to Federal standards. Generally, the EAC considers for accreditation those laboratories evaluated and recommended by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) pursuant to HAVA Section 231(b)(1). However, consistent with HAVA Section 231(b)(2)(B), the Commission may also vote to accredit laboratories outside of those recommended by NIST upon publication of an explanation of the reason for any such accreditation.
10. Certification of accreditation for Pro V&V with effective dates of March 26, 2020 through March 31st, 2021.
11. VSTL’s are VERY important because equipment vulnerabilities allow for deployment of algorithms and scripts to intercept, alter and adjust voting tallies.
12. There are only TWO accredited VSTLs (VOTING SYSTEM TEST LABORATORIES). In order to meet its statutory requirements under HAVA §15371(b), the EAC has developed the EAC’s Voting System Test Laboratory Accreditation Program. The procedural requirements of the program are established in the proposed information collection, the EAC Voting System Test Laboratory Accreditation Program Manual. Although participation in the program is voluntary, adherence to the program’s procedural requirements is mandatory for participants. The procedural requirements of this Manual will supersede any prior laboratory accreditation requirements issued by the EAC. This manual shall be read in conjunction with the EAC’s Voting System Testing and Certification Program Manual (OMB 3265-0019).
13. [excerpt from the full EAC document] Michigan requires that voting systems are certified by an Independent Testing Authority accredited by NASED and the board of state canvassers.
14. [excerpt from the full EAC document] Wisconsin requires that its voting systems receive approval from the independent testing authority accredited by NASED verifying that the voting systems meet all of the recommended FEC standards.
15. [excerpt from the full EAC document] Georgia requires that its voting systems are tested to EAC standards by EAC accredited labs and certified by the EAC.
16. [excerpt from the full EAC document] Pennsylvania requires that its voting systems are approved by a federally recognized independent testing laboratory as meeting federal voting system standards.
17. [excerpt from the full EAC document] Arizona requires that its voting systems are HAVA compliant and approved by a laboratory that is accredited pursuant to HAVA.
18. Pro V& V and SLI Gaming both lack evidence of EAC Accreditation as per the Voting System Testing and Certification Manual.
19. Pro V& V is owned and Operated by Jack Cobb. Real name is Ryan Jackson Cobb. The company Pro V&V was founded and run by Jack Cobb who formerly worked under the entity of Wyle Laboratories which is an AEROSPACE DEFENSE CONTRACTING ENTITY. The address information on the EAC, NIST and other entities for Pro V& V are different than that of what is on Pro V&V website. The EAC and NIST (ISO CERT) issuers all have another address.
74. Observing the elections, after a review of Michigan’s data a spike of 54,199 votes to Biden. Because it is pushing and pulling and keeping a short distance between the 2 candidates; but then a spike, which is how an algorithm presents; - and this spike means there was a pause and an insert was made, where they insert an algorithm. Block spikes in votes for JOE BIDEN were NOT paper ballots being fed or THUMB DRIVES. The algorithm block adjusted itself and the PEOPLE were creating the evidence to BACK UP the block allocation.
75. I have witnessed the same behavior of the election software in countries outside of the United States and within the United States. In -------, the elections conducted behaved in the same manner by allocating BLOCK votes to the candidate “chosen” to win.
76. Observing the data of the contested states (and others) the algorithm deployed is identical to that which was deployed in 2012 providing Barack Hussein Obama a block allocation to win the 2012 Presidential Elections.
77. The algorithm looks to have been set to give Joe Biden a 52% win even with an initial 50K+ vote block allocation was provided initially as tallying began (as in case of Arizona too). In the am of November 4, 2020 the algorithm stopped working, therefore another “block allocation” to remedy the failure of the algorithm. This was done manually as ALL the SYSTEMS shut down NATIONWIDE to avoid detection.
79. In Georgia during the 2016 Presidential Elections a failed attempt to deploy the scripts to block allocate votes from a centralized location where the “trap-door” key lay an attempt by someone using the DHS servers was detected by the state of GA. The GA leadership assumed that it was “Russians” but later they found out that the IP address was that of DHS.
85. I can personally attest that in 2013 discussions by the Obama / Biden administration were being had with various agencies in the deployment of such election software to be deployed in (Ukraine) in 2013.
86. On or about April 2013 a one year plan was set to fund and usher elections in (Ukraine).
87. Joe Biden was designated by Barack Hussein Obama to ensure the (Ukraine) accepted assistance.
88. John Owen Brennan and James (Jim) Clapper were responsible for the ushering of the intelligence surrounding the elections in (Ukraine).
89. Under the guise of Crisis support the US Federal Tax Payers funded the deployment of the election software and machines in (Ukraine) signing on with Scytl.
93. The elections were held on May 25, 2014 but in the early AM hours the election results were BLOCKED and the final tally was DELAYED flipping the election in favor of (Petro Poroshenko).
95. The vote tallying of all states NATIONWIDE stalled and hung for days – as in the case of Alaska that has about 300K registered voters but was stuck at 56% reporting for almost a week.
96. This “hanging” indicates a failed deployment of the scripts to block allocate remotely from one location as observed in (Ukraine) on May 26, 2014.
97. This would justify the presence of the election machine software representatives making physical appearances in the states where the election results are currently being contested.
98. A Dominion Executive appeared at the polling center in Detroit after midnight.
99. Considering that the hardware of the machines has NOT been examined in Michigan since 2017 by Pro V& V according to Michigan’s own reporting. COTS (Commercial available Off The Shelf products) are an avenue that hackers and bad actors seek to penetrate in order to control operations. Their software updates are the reason vulnerabilities to foreign interference in all operations exist.
100. The importance of VSTLs in underrated to protect up from foreign interference by way of open access via COTS software. Pro V& V who’s EAC certification EXPIRED on 24 FEB 2017 was contracted with the state of WISCONSIN.
101. In the United States each state is tasked to conduct and IV& V (Independent Verification and Validation) to provide assurance of the integrity of the votes.
102. If the “accredited” non-federal entities have NOT received EAC accreditation this is a failure of the states to uphold their own states standards that are federally regulated.
103. In addition, if the entities had NIST certificates they are NOT sufficing according the HAVA ACT 2002 as the role of NIST is clear.
104. Curiously, both companies PRO V&V and SLI GAMING received NIST certifications OUTSIDE the 24 month scope.
105. PRO V& V received a NIST certification on 26MAR2020 for ONE YEAR. Normally the NIST certification is good for two years to align with that of EAC certification that is good for two years.
16. Pro V&V certificate of accreditation was valid from March 26, 2020 through March 31, 2021.
107. The last PRO V&V EAC accreditation certificate (Item 8) of this declaration expired in February 2017 which means that the IV & V conducted by Michigan claiming that they were accredited is false.
108. The significance of VSTLs being accredited and examining the HARDWARE is key. COTS software updates are the avenues of entry.
109. As per DOMINION’S own petition, the modems they use are COTS therefore failure to have an accredited VSTL examine the hardware for points of entry by their software is key.
113. SLI Gaming is the other VSTL “accredited” by the EAC BUT there is no record of their accreditation. In fact, SLI was NIST ISO Certified 27 days before the election which means that PA IV&V was conducted without NIST cert for SLI being valid.
SLI Compliance’s certification of Accreditation effective October 7, 2020 through December 31, 2020.
115. In fact SLI was NIST ISO Certified for less than 90 days.
116. I can personally attest that high-level officials of the Obama/Biden administration and large private contracting firms met with a software company called GEMS which is ultimately the software ALL election machines run now running under the flag of DOMINION.
[There are 155 items to review in this affidavit.]
I declare under penalty of perjury that the forgoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
Executed this November 29th, 2020.
Terpsehore P Maras
We hope this has stoked your appetite to dig into the documents yourself. Take time to read the entire affidavit as well as reading the legal frameworks referenced above.
As the success of active election integrity court cases in Texas, Ohio, Georgia, Missouri and Kansas become more widely known, people will wonder how we got here. And they deserve to understand with the source evidence in the election laws of the United States.
It is unsustainable for the preservation of freedom to be stuck in a cycle where establishment news tells us we need to know. We need to read ALL the documents ourselves. As we remedy the failures that lead to the failed US election of 2020 and beyond, it is important that all citizens of the United States of America understand and obtain this knowledge themselves.
Why didn’t Tore sign her affidavit?
Thank you for spelling this out so clearly. Hopefully this will pave a path for all states to take. God Speed.