In the late afternoon on Wednesday, August 9, 2023 Tore Says went live with a historic announcement of a key victory in the state of Texas. This is a transcription of her show titled “BREAKING NEWS: A WIN FOR ELECTION INTEGRITY”.
We actually won and we're going to fix this. I am going to tell you how we won when it comes to election integrity.
I want to remind you of a truth that often gets overshadowed in the glitz and the glamor of this modern world. We live in an age where influencers and media stars capture the spotlight, where success seems to be defined by likes and follows. My post, repost, re-truths, truths, whatever. But let me tell you, the real fighters, the ones that truly shape the course of history, are not the ones on pedestals, but the ones in the arena. It's easy to get lost in the allure of those who seem to have it all. But remember, they haven't faced the battles, the struggles and the failures that shape character and forge resilience.
It's a person who dares to enter the arena, especially when they come with no weapons but themselves. Who gets their hands dirty, who faces criticism and ridicule head on, who truly embodies the spirit of a fighter with no title, no tiara, no classically trained in anything. The man or the woman in the arena knows the sting of defeat and the taste of disappointment and the weight of uncertainty.
They understand the challenges of pushing forward when the odds are stacked against them. They've learned that glory isn't found in a spotlight. It's found in relentless pursuit of a goal, despite the setbacks. The world might idolize the famous, but it's the underdogs, the fighters that really make it real. People in the arena understand the challenges of pushing forward when the odds are stacked, right? They're the ones who innovate, who challenge the status quo and who disrupt the norms. They aren't deterred by failure or deterred by naysayers. They're fueled by passion and resilience. And a burning desire to make a difference.
I think it's like 200 cases currently across the United States that no one hears about because they're not on some famous conservative or Inc... conservative Inc or liberalism Inc podcast or vlog.
So don't let the allure of fame blind you to the true source of strength. Don't be content to simply watch. That's all they do is make content. But don't be complacent. Don't sit on the sidelines marveling at the influencers and the stars. You're the stars. You're the fighters. You're the elite. You're the ones with the power to reshape your destiny to change the world. Remember the words of Theodore Roosevelt who spoke of the man in the arena? The one who strives valiantly, who errs, who comes up short again and again and again, but knows the true taste of achievement, and who dares greatly.
I want you all to understand the challenges that you've embraced, the struggles and the setbacks. Embrace the arena. Eat that shit for lunch. That's what I do. If anyone, I should have been buried six feet under with what people say or how they ignore or they say things. But the people that matter know. I mean, truth has a way of coming through, huh? And character, when tested, your spirit is honed and your legacy is forged. You guys are creating a legacy for our future and I am so proud.
I did tell you that it all starts in Ohio, but the Lone Star State kind of popped the enchilada open. It's exactly what happened. I told you that three years ago. The arena waits and it's time for you, the people, to show. So today, not only will I showcase to you how we win, and I'll tell you how that happened.
DC Trip, Winter of 2020
I want you to understand that the phenomenon of people listening to individuals who appear popular or influential can be attributed to very many several psychological and social cognitive factors; limited attention and information processing. Some people are dumb. Emotional appeal, desire for social connection, familiarity, media publicity, status success, authority bias. Individuals are inclined to trust and listen to those they perceive as authorities or experts in a particular domain. Yet, when the real experts speak, no one listens.
It's all a show.
And so here's what happened back in 2020. I went to Washington, D.C., I sat in front of many people and I said, do not chase the ballots and the truck drivers. Because we already know they're manufacturing evidence to match the digital evidence. Do not do that. I said that loud and clear. I even said it live on air. It's all documented. You can't say I didn’t. And I sat in front of all those leaders that you cheer for and said, we're going to use the booby trap they had for President Trump in case he won.
The elections that were held in November of 2017 are null and void. The elections held in November of 2018 are null and void. They all laughed. I said, that leaves us with about 56 Senators and Congress. Well, just the ones that had special elections, and they laughed at me. I said, what? You want to go chase ballots? You want to educate America and the world on how source code works? You want to talk about foreign interference? You want to educate people on things and you've got to meet them where they're at. You can’t. You cannot educate the populace to understand, especially those that don't want to be educated. You got to keep it simple, stupid, right? And they all laughed. And I said, OK. OK, that's fine. You can laugh. But it's a fat lady that sings. That's how it goes.
Quo Warranto
So they laughed and I said that again and again and again. But obviously, you, the people, not me. You, the people, not me, started to take control of your own communities and you filed. Do you remember those quo warrantos? Boy, did that quo warrantos help today. All of you filed those and everyone laughed because you went pro se. It's almost like I knew there would be no lawyers.
So you all filed these quo warrantos that everyone laughed at. Then we filed federal lawsuits. How many times did I hand out my debit card so that we can pay for it? Because in essence, you're my employer. So why not give back to my employer? And all of you filed these suits and all of them failed because judges were throwing them out. But they served their purpose. That's the way it is. It's almost like back in 2017 when I sent letters to every single member of Congress and every single member of the Senate and said, hey, the election machines aren't certified and we have elections in November of 2017. What's going on?
Not one Congressperson responded to that, but you know who did? It's actually in my affidavit. Senator Wyden sent a letter to those institutions that we call the VSTL (Voting System Test Laboratories). That the machines are certified, good to go and safe. And said, we got to make sure that you have certifications. Can you make sure of that? So for that reason, thank you, Senator Wyden or whatever staffer wrote it, because we only needed one. One tiny little stone to bring it all down. And here's where the tiny stone lies in a little county in Texas that got there.
I did that one tiny thing, because I was curious. Right before Trump takes office, Obama decides that he's going to hand elections over to DHS and CISA. It was created. And during that year, if you remember, they implemented the mandatory, almost better use of CIS security, which is a wholehearted branch of DHS and CISA. So your elections are clearly federalized, but they're not telling you that.
In 2019 Millie Weaver went down to Kentucky, having received information from a whistleblower. And I analyzed all of that and I talked about how they did their scam on changing the votes and altering things. But, you know, I can't educate everyone, even though it's simple algebra. It is extremely hard to educate people that do not understand technology, or those concepts. Occam's razor, parsimonious. How many times have I said that over a decade on Twitter and on the radio? The simplest answer is usually the right one and here's proof of that.
Ohio’s Independent Secretary of State
As you all know, I ran for secretary of state, and didn’t win. But I won. Everyone keeps screaming, “We need patriots to run.” How many of you can actually run? Will the GOP fund you? No, because the GOP blocked me. They blocked me so hard that they broke the law blatantly to keep me off. It was actually the GOP that contested me being on the ballot. Why? Because as an independent, I have the right to inspect the counting of the vote.
While all your fantastic influencers were laughing at me, they didn't understand how a genius thinks because they're not geniuses. Geniuses, there's always a method to their madness. It went all the way up to the Supreme Court. And by the time it got there, the elections were over. So how am I going to observe the counting of the vote? Which means I had to see the software. Wait till you see what we're doing in federal court with that.
During that time, I learned a lot of things. Sometimes to dispel the darkness, you have to go through it and you're going to see why Texas matters in this, too.
I said there were no certified machines in 2017 and 2018 elections, and I can prove that without refute. A judge in Texas could not rule against the people that filed. I want you to pay attention. But while I was running, they tried so hard to knock me off the ballot that they broke the law. That on the day that they were sending off overseas ballots, pay attention to what I'm telling you right now, we're not just talking military, we're talking overseas ballots.
The Secretary of State of Ohio said she, “doesn't have to be concerned about that because I send it off by a PDF. I only email the embassies a copy of what the ballot should look like and then they print it off and people vote.” And I said, wait, what?
Keep those two things in mind right now.
You the people, not me. You the people did this, not me. I'm pointing this out. I'm just the think tank. I'm just the previous super deep stator.
Here's what they did. They went pro se. But they didn't target the 2020 elections. Like I’ve always said, maybe we shouldn't focus on 2020. The geniuses and influencers reply to me: “You kidding? They did this! They had all these mules!” And I said, yeah, I told you they were going to do that because we had that ready in Ukraine too. Because I rigged the elections in Ukraine. They will manufacture the tangible evidence to match the digital evidence. We already know that. So we're going to catch them. And then what? It doesn't matter. The media is going to give you the response.
I actually told everyone that in summer of 2020. Hey, you know, who's going to call your elections? The media. And you're going to bend the knee.
No Certifications Exists
President Trump already knows. He knows who his people are ignoring, who his people are listening to and who are his real people. And you know who his real people are? You. The people.
Let me tell you a story about a woman in a small county. There was a special election in one of those years, 2017, 2018. Based on my affidavit. I'm not going to specify, so I don't disclose the county. We asked the election commission, the board of elections of our county, to give us the certifications of the machines. To show us that those machines were certified. And they went to court. They went through discovery. They had standing. And guess what is on the record? No certifications exist.
They can't manifest one and retroactively produce it. This is a tiny, tiny stone. It's like Goliath. And this woman rocked it. And she was so nervous today. And the judge is very nervous. And I'll tell you why. They can make up fake indictments against you. So it doesn't matter.
Something that I also told your leadership in 2020. According to a congressionally passed law called the HAVA Act, the certifications must be signed by the EAC commissioner. They can’t just fake the signature. Because there was no EAC commissioner. They were so fixated on “get Trump. Russia, Russia.” They forgot, there was no quorum. The EAC agency could not operate for those two years. Two years. Nothing was valid. The EAC was not operating because there was no quorum.
Do you pay attention now? Do you see how you box people in? Let me tell you. I don't just self-proclaim myself as the best at game theory. I will box the shit out of you if I want to.
And I was planning this all along while watching from 2015, from the presidential transition team that I was screaming at the top of my lungs. This was the same way Podesta got his in to the Trump transition team. But nobody listens because I'm not popular. I'm just a think tank. Genius think tank. And I just want to be cocky just because I’m salty right now.
But here's the awesomeness. They went to the judge. I'm just going to find the documentation of what this judge said. So they were supposed to produce this documentation. They're going back and forth. And the court said, hold on, because they just got them. They bought themselves 45 days. And this is where I need all of America to act. I don't care if you don't like me. Do it for your country.
The Quo Warranto documents that Mr. Felt referenced to that he responded to. Obviously, he had to communicate with other parties to verify what the request was on the Quo Warranto.
So that's kind of a communication we would like to expect that there would be between himself and others and stuff like that. So I think it's kind of the other part to consider here.
The court says, “Response?”
Mr. Felt said, “I mean, that's assuming there are documents and, you know,”
and then the person says, “communications.”
And he said, “well, I mean,”
and the court says, “and you can't speak to him directly when you’re… Sorry. In court. You can't just do that?”
“I mean, my apologies. If you're, you know, if you were asking for a file that the district attorney's office had in conducting an inquiry in response to a letter requesting a Quo Warranto action, then, you know, that would be a request for a district attorney's file. That would not be communications between members of commissioners.”
So they're defining communications. Pay attention. This is how scared they were last year when we had this hearing. Okay?
“Uh, and the district attorney's office who represents the commissioner's court and their agents, I wouldn't, I don't believe that.”
And the court says, “unless there's something in that file that was direct communication. Do you have this? Yes, we do. Or no, we don’t.”
And he says, “no, we don’t.”
“As far as, you know, the Quo Warranto action itself, if there was, you know, so-and-so is the election administer, I don't consider it an agent of the so-and-so county commissioner's court because I think he's actually independent of the court in his position.”
So now, pay attention. The elections administrator is independent of the county. Pay attention.
The court: “So who hires and fires him?”
“Well, they may hire and fire him or they may not. I don't know.”
And then, you know, the, the elections administrator chimes in,
“Judge, I'm hired by the election commission with approval of the commissioner's court who takes my salary. The election commission could recommend to hire/fire me. And then commissioner's court would either agree with that or not. But in my day-to-day stuff, I do not report to the commissioner's court.”
The court says, “okay. Again, I'm just now seeing this this morning. I need to look at this. I think a little bit more carefully,” says the judge. “If you have anything else to argue on this issue, because on the motion to compel, so as to number eight, what's your response to that?”
And they say, “we have nothing responsive.”
The court: “Nine, 10. It was your argument that these, these are some sort of confidential requirement that keeps you from producing these?”
And the guy says, “correct.”
And now we're talking 2017, 2018, guys. Right? Not 2020.
And “correct.”
“And the Texas government code section, 52-139, confidentiality of government information related to security and infrastructure issue for computers.”
The court: “5521-139. Okay. Okay. And your motion to compel was, what about number six? Request number six. What's y’all response to that?”
He says, “we complied with that. We turned over the information.”
“Okay. Because it's contained in your motion to compel as well.”
“Well, the documents weren't signed. And it clearly states,” says the citizen by herself. “Well, the documents weren't signed and it clearly states on, on the contract that they're not effective unless they’re signed. It's pretty much the same as the accreditation certificates. They're not signed by the EAC chair, you know, the election commission, the EAC commissioner. And you know, if, if, if we're trying to find out what's going on here, what's in these contracts, I mean, even in the exclusion and the warranty, you know, this is our votes we're talking about. Let me just make that clear.”
And the court says, “okay.”
“And we're talking about,”
Court says, "yeah, I understood that. We're not getting the merits here.”
And “okay. We're talking discovery.”
“Okay. If they have given you what they have signed or unsigned, if they have given you what they have, what's more than you want, right? They gave you an unsigned and said, we don't have a signed one. Right? I don't even know what this is, but if they don't have a signed copy, they've given you what they've got. What else do you want?”
“The signed copy.”
Court: “Well, if they don't have that, I can't order someone to, give somebody else something they don't have.”
Petitioner: “Well, if the county didn't sign it, then, then, then the contract's not effective. And the electronic voting systems shouldn't have been used.”
Court turns to the DA: “Do you have a signed copy?”
“No, I don't. I mean, sure. There's got to, I mean, it was, I mean, it's in, it was approved on the commissioner's court. I can pull up the commissioner court's minutes where the contract was approved, but…"
The court says, “sure you can.”
“But the, the…”
“Get a copy of the contract.”
“Sure. But I mean, I gave them, gave, gave, they gave them the contract."
And the citizen says, “several different contracts with different dates.”
The court says, “I'm sorry?”
“They gave us several different contracts with different dates."
The court says, “well, many times contracts go through iterations before they finally have one that everybody's happy with and signed. So that means nothing to me. But I'm telling him to get you a signed copy and give it to you.”
“Okay. I would like that one. Okay. That's effective.”
I think we've talked about blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, and then they arrange they don't have the document. Let's move forward to what happened after that. Are you ready? Because this is where it gets fun. Bottom line is the county could not produce a signed, and verified EAC certification for the machines during that election. Now, I want you guys to understand what that means. Think about it.
“This lawsuit asserts that since the voting machines do not meet required certification standards, the true outcome of the election cannot be determined. As a result, they claim that the court overseeing the election should declare the election results to be void. And this assertion is based on relevant sections of Texas election code specifically 233.011 and 233.012. In summary, you, the people are arguing that due to the lack of proper certification for the voting machine systems used in elections, the trail should declare the election result invalid and void.”
And guess what? Today, we had a hearing. And who wants to take a wild guess what happened? The DA walks in with a motion to dismiss and says, "Oh my God, all the judges across the nation are dismissing all these election lawsuits." Sorry, buddy, but they're talking about 2020. We're not talking about 2020. Oops. “And we need the AG to give his opinion.”
Oh, so now they've got 45 days. 45 days to get an opinion from the attorney general. That refers to a form of legal interpretation or advisory statement provided. Why would the judge say, "Okay, we'll get that." Because the attorney general is typically the highest ranking legal officer in the state or country, right? If it's the basic AG like Garland. But the attorney general in this case is Paxton? Or is it not Paxton? Or do they not have an AG now because they went after Paxton? So they haven't even confirmed one. But in 45 days, they need to answer as to why they didn't have a signed document that has been codified in the law, not only in Texas law, but in a congressionally passed act. And they can't manifest their certificate out of nowhere because that would be a crime of fraud. Because there was no quorum. So how are you going to get it signed if there was nobody to sign it and there's no changes? COVID happened in 2020, that can’t be the excuse. We're talking about elections in 2017 and 2018.
So when requested, the attorney general's office is going to issue a legal opinion on various matters, including the interpretation of law and constitutionality. Based on legislation and legal rights. But ask yourself, why would the court agree to it? Well, there's a lot of reasons and I'll give you the top eight.
Legal interpretation.
See, the judge has to rule that the law is the law and now they're caught in a box. They can't manifest the document out of nowhere. Because there was no one to sign it. And then they can't say, "Well, the elections are valid even though." Because then we could go into the statute of limitations. It's been five years. Actually, this is a constitutional-ish provision because this is a federal congressional act and we have the right to be heard. So it's a violation of your first amendment. There is no statute of limitations if you want to get into it. But, I'm not a lawyer, I'm just a nerd.
And so here's where we're at. Why is the judge okay? And why did the DA ask? And oh yeah, they removed Paxton.
If I can do predictive analytics, others can too. This is how they operate. But then there's also this reason of uncertainty. There's uncertainty of the interpretation. Like what do we do? This has never happened before. What are we gonna rewind the clock? That would mean anyone elected in Texas in 2017 and 2018, including judges, would be null and void.
That would also mean that the senators and congressmen that were elected in Texas on a federal level in 2017 and 2018 would be null and void too. “Oh, we can't do that. That's-- you can't do that. That sets legal—That's a constitutional issue.” Point it out. So which one is more important? Ensuring that you have the right to your First Amendment to be heard at the ballot box? Or, “oh, it's going to disrupt things.”
Into The Future
Let me tell you how this would work. First, it starts in Texas. The Lone Star State, as always coming through. Which has a pending of 20-some cases. Most of them with standing because they used My Affidavit. Which was never debunked, but no one read it.
Right now, it looks like Pelosi when she was re-elected in 2018 wasn't valid. So the things that she did as speakers of the house, not valid. The money that they spent, not valid. The laws that they passed, not valid. If we would have done this in 2020 as I suggested to everyone in the winter of 2020 in DC before Joe Biden got inaugurated, it would have been much easier. Instead we got, let them see how bad it gets.
We could have fixed this. Right now, we could have been at the-- we're fixing this. And in 2022, we would have been having special elections for actual American citizens running, rather than propped up, groomed idiots that CONSERVATIVE INC. and LIBERAL INC. wanted.
So, I urge every single one of you that can hear my voice today, look to your county.
CALL TO ACTION
Find in your county where you had special elections. Maybe some senator died or resigned, local. Even if it's a state legislator or judge. Anything! Find a special election that happened in 2017, 2018. Get into your state groups and analyze and file the shit out of it in your county courts. The law is the law. If you want to see what the codifying of the HAVA Act in your state, if it was mandated or suggested to follow the HAVA Act, please refer to your state group admins.
That document was actually scrubbed from all databases, but I had it, because I was watching our election. I may not be the person that writes the code for the machines. I mean, it's global election management system (GEMS). So it's the same code globally, but whatever. But I know how they work. I'm actually a specialist, not your stupid pundits. But they call me a grifter.
So here's what I need everyone to do. You want to fix this? This is how you fuck shit up. You find the elections that were deployed in your county. Go local. Don't even worry about federal. Focus on your local. Take two, three of your friends. File a suit. Because once you do your local, well, that's a foundation. So I guess it pops off.
Don't talk about the counting of the ballots. We don't care. We don't.
At this point, we're sticking to the law. Don't get into the weeds of things. If we get into the weeds, we get lost. We’ve got to have laser focus. Just a tiny little stone. That's how you take out Goliath. You don't go in there with a boulder or with a fire hose.
Say during those elections, you know, maybe I'll post a lawsuit or one of the many that are currently happening in the United States that you're not hearing about because CONSERVATIVE INC. is busy telling you to focus on other things, which you will not be able to fix if your elections aren't fixed.
We can't fix things if we don't have elections.
In your county, 2017, 2018, they can not refute the law. They will come out to you and say, “well, it's been five years.” Well, I was just made aware of it and, you know, rights and all. So it's pretty interesting because it is at that point that you're going to find that there are things that are not correct. Take action.
OBSTRUCTION
So in essence, I want you to tell, I want to tell you directly from the horse's mouth. The District Attorney was withholding from discovery communications we requested between them and the county commissioners and all their agents and employee representatives on the topic of certification of the machines. We had three people send in quo warranto to letters and CC the EA (Election Authority) in reply. The DA's assistant responded back that it was privileged information and a bunch of other excuses at the end of May. We asked for a privilege log. It has to be answered in 15 days and they ignored us. So after they dismissed that deadline, we asked again, and they answered that they had no communication.
You cannot claim privilege and claim you have no documents. THEY CAN’T BE BOTH!
We filed the motion to compel the day before the pretrial conference, which was scheduled on June 26, 2021. The court canceled the pretrial conference later that day. Moved it to the same day trial, July 6. When we filed a motion for continuance and requested a hearing for the motion to compel, how can we have a trial right after a pretrial conference hearing and a motion to compel when they were both withholding discovery?
Today we had the motion to compel discussion first. Our people got the judge to understand that they were withholding documents. It was a little tricky because at first she said she had no way of knowing if they had documents if they said they didn't have any. So they explained that two exhibits were filed into the case, CC'd to the Election Authority. They had documents that were responsive. The Election Authority and the DA had communications. They had documents that were responsive to the request because we saw that they were CC'd on the email. So they lied on the record. The guy who signed the letters was in the courtroom. She did not understand that the defense did not provide those. We did.
So in other words, the defense, the county withheld information. We have a really big problem with FOIA (Freedom Of Information Act) and sunshine laws. Remember I caught the attorney general, the now dead, suicided North Dakota attorney general on that? And he lost a huge Supreme Court case because of that.
So they withheld it and they lied, but we already had the documentation. My other friends were closer to him and his body was shaking. Another said his voice was shaking. We know he's lying and we assume he's withholding their communications on how they decided to answer to the quo warranto letters.
Eventually the judge understood what they were saying and told the DA to produce it. And she started going down the rest of the items and they declined to answer or claim some excuse. She was really interested in the CIS security and DHS questions we had asked about, and that they had excused away for security reasons. She also said she needs to study our documents some more. She's a retired judge and only got our motions this morning. She said that she had been sick for the past two weeks, she granted the continuance and this is why we were here today.
The shady judge that they had last year who trampled on the constitution to deny the county chair the case on the merits of a TRO (Temporary Restraining Order) hearing and one witness. Well, they hit her out. One of them was at the petitioner's table with two other ladies. And I was mostly out of the view of the judge since I was on the side. I did not want a disadvantage in this case.
This is how you freaking win! This is how you win!
You are relentless. And the more they say no, the more you say, I'll just jump that wall too. The more they say no! Okay, I'll just break your wall. The more they say no, you keep coming because you have them in a box. They cannot move. The law is the law. They cannot change the law.
All of you out there should be on your computers looking when you had special elections in 2017 and 2018. Pull it. Find the date in your county. If you don't have any in your county, look in your state. And then you could just follow the template. And that's it.
The HAVA, 2002 Act, is congressionally passed. But if people pay attention to it, it's the pre-work to get you guys on a digital election system where you won't even see your vote. It'll be on a QR code with your COVID pass and your ID and all that stuff. Read it. Know it. Because they can't just do it one day from another. So that's number one on the list.
We actually won.
And while all these people that have paraded around the nation showing you all their fantasmical lawsuits, then no standing. Except for Georgia. Georgia is coming into focus. I did tell you that indictment was coming from there a long time ago. I think the president hinted at it too, most recently. But I don't know what I'm talking about when it comes to elections because everyone else is a specialist, right?
Overseas Ballots
I lived overseas. Every time there would be an election, they would send me a ballot because I was registered overseas. That ballot would come to me and I would fill it in. And I would send it back. I ran for secretary of state in Ohio in 2022. While we were running in all this, as I told you at the beginning, I was advised that there is a PDF that Frank LaRose had to update to email to the overseas embassies. And I was like, wait a minute. What? Are you telling me that they just print off ballots from the embassy?
For the state of Ohio that only has 88 counties? There are states that have more than 88 counties. But are you saying that they have 88 versions on that PDF? Probably. Right. To send it off.
You need to focus on things you can fix and accept the things you can't.
Fun fact. Do you know the highest rate of fraud of social security being collected in our nation, according to CMS and Social Security Administration and the GSA is? The highest fraud of people collecting social security checks over the age of 65 is done from people that live overseas. Meaning they're dead and people still collect the checks.
As your state, check to see how many overseas ballots were counted. I'm pretty sure that if we want to find 12,000 votes in Georgia, we could look at the overseas ballots. I'm pretty sure in the counties that gave you Biden that were close. Neck and neck. Guarantee you, you're going to find those overseas ballots.
REPORT:
The ballot sent to Michigan's military and overseas voters. The Secretary of State believes 400 of those incorrect ballots were printed today. They have the wrong vice presidential candidate listed under Donald Trump's name. Let's get right to Mara McDonald with more on what Benson's office has to say about it tonight. Mara.
“Well, Devin, tonight they're saying that this is a temporary error. That's number one. Number two, if any of these misprinted ballots do get voted and do get returned, there is a workaround.”
“Take a close look at this ballot headed to Michigan's overseas and military personnel. Under Donald Trump's name is not Mike Pence, but Jeremy Cohen. Who is Jeremy Cohen? I hear you asking. Well, he actually goes by his nickname, which is Spike, and he's the vice presidential candidate for the Libertarian Party. How do Michigan ballots get printed with this kind of an error? Per Jocelyn Benson's office, quote, "There was a temporary error in the QVF data that caused some ballots downloaded today to display incorrect ballot information when clerks downloaded the QVF ballots sent to military and overseas voters. QVF stands for the Qualified Voter File, which the Secretary of State maintains. The Board of Elections reached out to all local clerks and told them to reissue the ballot and tell the voter to ignore the previous one. So what happens if someone votes on a misprinted ballot anyway? Tonight, the Secretary of State says it will still count."
“Back here live. So how does it count? What is the workaround? According to the Secretary of State, if one of those misprinted ballots does make its way back here, it will then have the local clerk reissue the ballot with a Trump-Pence standard on it. So there's a workaround. Let's just hope we have no more temporary errors.”
Did they just say that if they voted for Trump and Spike, that they would change the ballot and just make it Pence? So what about Spike on the Libertarian ticket? That's weird. You mean they alter your ballot after they receive it? That's so weird. I just thought I'd bring that up.
So all of you should be asking that question. Give me 2020, 2021, and 2022. Oh, and by the way, ask for the ones in 2017, 2018, and 2019. Just tell them, "I just want the number of overseas ballots you received in my county. Please.” That's how you overcome voter fraud. Well, election fraud.
My federal lawsuit from my campaign, we spent over $100,000 in lawsuits just trying to get on the ballot. They broke the law every step of the way. You know who colluded with them? The GOP. The same GOP that thought that Ohioans were stupid to vote yes on issue one. But anyway, I digress.
No Lawyers, Pro Se
I just wanted to let you guys know that things are happening. And, you know, the fact that we were going pro se, well, it's because we knew there weren't going to be any lawyers. All you had to do was look at the communications that were made under a FOIA request back in 2017 by Mark Elias and them saying that, if they contest it, we're going to bring attorneys and we're going to go after their attorneys. Oh shit. Didn't they create Project 65? My God. And that's all open record. But where the hell is Conservative Inc? I thought they were all about freedom.
Or maybe they're just not specialists because you know who the real specialists are? The people. And I want you to remember that. You are not the underdog. We had a big win today because a judge demanded, oh, well, “I need to see the signed document.” You can't produce a document— they can't produce a document that doesn't exist. And if they produce it illegally, I mean, are they going to change the law backwards? They can't do that. Policies aren't laws. You can't use policies to contradict what the Congressionally Passed Act said and that was codified in your state's legislature.
I hope all of you are getting cracking. Turn them all off. Listen to your president and just focus on your community. Been saying that for years. Stop going out and looking somewhere else. Focus on your local community. See how it's done?
The Lone Star State, over 20 cases right now active and no one's even paying attention. Why? Because they're not making money off of it. It's just regular people chipping in a dollar and a dollar. And you know, they don't even have a lawyer. They're going pro se because you don't need a lawyer to READ. We can all READ. “Oh, but they're going to make us jump through hoops.” That's okay. The judges are compelled by law to have that leeway for the people.
So when you think that you need a hero on a white horse. Or, I don't know, with a blue check mark to tell you what's right and what's wrong with their fancy equipment and their “trust the plan.” You should trust the plan. Trust God's plan, because he's got this and no one can foresee divine intervention.
Today, August 9th, 2023, we got our first win on this election debacle. It's unfortunate we could have had it sooner, but sometimes people have to see just how powerful they are. Where all these big guys failed. You win. I'm extremely proud of you and I'm so excited.
Enjoy this win. No matter how tiny it seems, you only need one thread to pull to destroy the whole thing. That's all you need. It's one domino, one piece in Jenga that destroys it all. Just one.
Texas, the Lone Star State, Lone Star. Like we said, it starts in Ohio. The Lone Star will lead the way. And this is that little foot in the door where you're like, not so fast. Here we go. We don't need anybody big. We just need to trust ourselves. And this is a testament to the power of the people. Congratulations. This is exciting. God bless.